Original Research
Ethical considerations of corporate social responsibility - A South African perspective
Submitted: 26 March 2018 | Published: 31 March 2015
About the author(s)
B. Ackers, Department of Auditing, College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (2MB)Abstract
Today, companies are under increasing pressure to implement corporate social responsibility [CSR] programmes that account for the economic, social and environmental impacts of their operations. In addition to companies voluntarily
wanting to be seen as responsible corporate citizens, the requirement for CSR reporting is being institutionalised by the King Code of Governance [King III] in South Africa. The application of King III is mandatory for all companies listed
on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange [JSE], albeit on an 'apply or explain' basis. King III requires companies to not only disclose their CSR performance, but also to ensure that such disclosures have been independently assured. Irrespective of
the underlying reason for companies disclosing their CSR performance and for providing independent assurance thereon, companies are moving away from simplistically applying the cliche attributed to Friedman that "the social responsibility of business was to use its resources to engage in activities that would increase profits". Companies that have traditionally provided financial reporting to shareholders, are now beginning to account for their non-financial performance to other stakeholders as well. This paradigm shift requires those charged with company governance and reporting (including accounting professionals usually associated with financial reporting), to re-examine their morals, values and ethical beliefs.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4584Total article views: 18027
Crossref Citations
1. A practical explanation of ethics as a good corporate governance principle in South Africa and New Zealand – A case study
Cornelius Killian
Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship vol: 85 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.19108/KOERS.85.1.2465
2. Do you reap what you sow? Driving mechanism of supply chain transparency on consumers' indirect reciprocity
Shaohua He
Frontiers in Psychology vol: 14 year: 2023
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081297
3. Independent corporate social responsibility assurance: a response to soft laws, or influenced by company size and industry sector?
Barry Ackers
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance vol: 14 issue: 4 first page: 278 year: 2017
doi: 10.1057/s41310-017-0026-7
4. The experiences of employees participating in organisational corporate social responsibility initiatives
Gretha Cook, Dirk J. Geldenhuys
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology vol: 44 year: 2018
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1481
5. Strategic Alliances in Firm-Centric and Collective Contexts: Implications for Indigenous Entrepreneurship
Antony I. Jongwe, Peter W. Moroz, Moses Gordon, Robert B. Anderson
Economies vol: 8 issue: 2 first page: 31 year: 2020
doi: 10.3390/economies8020031
6. The Dynamics of Logistics Industry Involvement in Malaysia’s E-Commerce
Ah Huai Ah Chan
Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences year: 2026
doi: 10.55463/issn.1674-2974.53.1.12
7. National Corporate Governance Codes and IT Governance Transparency in Annual Reports
Steven De Haes, Tim Huygh, Anant Joshi, Laura Caluwe
Journal of Global Information Management vol: 27 issue: 4 first page: 91 year: 2019
doi: 10.4018/JGIM.2019100105
8. A review of accounting research in internationalising journals in the South African region
Charl J. De Villiers, Pei-Chi K. Hsiao
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences vol: 20 issue: 1 year: 2017
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1729
9. Corporate Social Responsibility in the South African Public Sector: A Focus on Ethical Responsibility
Monument Thulani Bongani Makhanya
Politeia vol: 41 issue: 1 & 2 year: 2023
doi: 10.25159/2663-6689/13863
