Original Research

An investigation into the small firm effect on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange

P. De Villiers, A. J. Lowings, T. Pettit, J. Affleck-Graves
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 17, No 4 | a1055 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v17i4.1055 | © 2018 P. De Villiers, A. J. Lowings, T. Pettit, J. Affleck-Graves | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 1986

About the author(s)

P. De Villiers, Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, South Africa
A. J. Lowings, Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, South Africa
T. Pettit, Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, South Africa
J. Affleck-Graves, Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (910KB)

Abstract

Recent studies on the New York Stock Exchange have provided empirical evidence which suggests that small market capitalization firms outperform large market capitalization firms in terms of share price performance. This appears valid even after adjusting for the additional risk borne by the small firms. This has become known as the 'small firm effect' and questions the validity of many traditional pricing models such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model. In this paper, the small firm effect is examined on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The risk-adjusted performance of portfolios comprising large firms is contrasted with that of small firms. Three measures of size are used, namely market capitalization, asset base and traded volume. In all three cases, no evidence of a small firm effect is apparent. Indeed, if anything, the large firms appear to provide superior investment performance on the JSE.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1531
Total article views: 629

 

Crossref Citations

1. Value and size investment strategies during the global financial crisis: evidence from the South African equity market
K. J. Barnard, M. B. Bunting
South African Journal of Accounting Research  vol: 29  issue: 2  first page: 177  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1080/10291954.2015.1006486