Original Research

The information content of dividends on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: An empirical analysis

L. L. Ooms, A. A. Archer, E. V.D.M. Smit
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 18, No 4 | a1017 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v18i4.1017 | © 2018 L. L. Ooms, A. A. Archer, E. V.D.M. Smit | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 1987

About the author(s)

L. L. Ooms, University of Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
A. A. Archer, University of Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
E. V.D.M. Smit, University of Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (906KB)

Abstract

The authors attempt to make a contribution to the research into the validity of the efficient market hypothesis on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange by investigating the market's reaction to dividend announcements. Evidence is presented that the efficient market hypothesis is not invalidated as traders on dividend information are not able to generate returns which are significantly different from the return generated by the market portfolio. It seems that the market is not sophisticated enough to distinguish between good and bad news as both portfolios yield either positive or negative abnormal returns. In quite a few cases investors holding a bad news portfolio were better off than holders of a good news portfolio. These facts suggest that the market is probably not reacting to dividend information but to the underlying earnings information which is simultaneously released. These results were obtained by applying the conventional techniques for announcement studies and it is obvious that this methodology should be refined and improved and further adapted to local practices in order to be able to give conclusive answers.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1723
Total article views: 587

 

Crossref Citations

1. Does Lintner’s dividend model explain South African dividend payments?
H.P. Wolmarans
Meditari Accountancy Research  vol: 11  issue: 1  first page: 243  year: 2003  
doi: 10.1108/10222529200300015