Original Research

Does investing in sound corporate governance pay? A South African study

N. Mans-Kemp, P. D. Erasmus, S. Viviers
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 48, No 2 | a26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i2.26 | © 2018 N. Mans-Kemp, P. D. Erasmus, S. Viviers | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 15 March 2018 | Published: 30 June 2017

About the author(s)

N. Mans-Kemp, Department of Business Management, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
P. D. Erasmus, Department of Business Management, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
S. Viviers, Department of Business Management, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (765KB)

Abstract

Despite increased recognition of the importance of sound corporate governance practices in emerging markets, previous researchers reported inconclusive evidence on the association between corporate governance and financial performance. Authors that predominantly focused on board-related variables might, however, have failed to reflect the complex nature of corporate governance. The financial performance measures employed in the majority of previous studies also ignored the potential risk-reducing benefits that sound corporate governance could hold for emerging market firms. The purpose of this article was thus to investigate the relationship between a comprehensive measure of corporate governance and the risk-adjusted performance of selected South African companies. A unique corporate governance database was compiled by conducting content analysis on the considered companies’ annual reports over the period 2002 to 2010. Aspects related to nine corporate governance categories were taken into account. In addition to the accounting and market-based performance measures that were employed in previous studies, South African companies’ risk-adjusted performance was also taken into account. The capital asset pricing model and the Fama-French three-factor model were employed to estimate risk-adjusted abnormal returns for four corporate governance-sorted portfolios. Both estimations revealed that the portfolio comprising of companies with the highest corporate governance scores managed to significantly outperform the market.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3946
Total article views: 1483

 

Crossref Citations

1. Assessing the business case for environmental, social and corporate governance practices in South Africa
Ruth Johnson, Nadia Mans-Kemp, Pierre D. Erasmus
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences  vol: 22  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v22i1.2727

2. The association between board characteristics and the risk-adjusted return of South African companies
Gerrit Kok, Cornelis H. van Schalkwyk, Elda Du Toit
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance  vol: 18  issue: 1  first page: 58  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1057/s41310-020-00096-9

3. The link between environmental, social and corporate governance disclosure and the cost of capital in South Africa
Ruth Johnson
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences  vol: 13  issue: 1  year: 2020  
doi: 10.4102/jef.v13i1.543

4. Corporate governance and the value relevance of accounting information: Empirical evidence from South Africa
Nabeelah Daniels, Anna-Retha Smit
Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research  vol: 25  issue: 1  first page: 24  year: 2023  
doi: 10.54483/sajaar.2023.25.1.2

5. Sustainability reporting and agriculture industries’ performance: worldwide evidence
Amina Buallay
Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies  vol: 12  issue: 5  first page: 769  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1108/JADEE-10-2020-0247

6. The impact of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on SA REITs’ performance
Nosipho Moloi, Omokolade Akinsomi, Woei Chyuan Wong
Journal of Property Research  vol: 41  issue: 3  first page: 193  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/09599916.2024.2357108