Original Research
Enabling organisational ambidexterity: A leadership perspective
Submitted: 13 July 2020 | Published: 02 June 2021
About the author(s)
Liezl Bell, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, Johannesburg, South AfricaKarl Hofmeyr, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Purpose: Innovation implies change that causes disruption. Ambidexterity is required to balance disruption and change with the counter side, stability, to enhance efficiency. This study set out to understand how the leadership of an organisation can ensure a focus simultaneously an explore logic, required for innovation, and the exploit functions that are needed for efficiency.
Design/methodology/approach: This research sought to shed new light on how leaders manage the structural changes required within an organisation to support ambidexterity. It fits into the inductive research approach. A qualitative, exploratory study through semi-structured interviews was completed to enhance the understanding of this understudied phenomenon.
Findings/results: The research builds on the current understanding of ambidexterity, different operating models, integration mechanisms and possible organisational structure to enable simultaneously explore and exploit. Respondents were able to suggest how organisations can utilise the ambidexterity continuum as a vehicle to understand the current organisational change logic and required future strategy.
Practical implications: Based on the research findings, a model was conceptualised, which included the leadership capabilities required to deal with both existing core business and new venture processes and structures, as well as the integration of these disparate elements.
Originality/value: The literature is not clear as to how leaders engender the changes required within the structure of organisations to enable ambidexterity. The research provides a framework that describes how organisations can balance the explore and exploit functions concurrently, as well as leadership capabilities required to achieve this.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4763Total article views: 8271
Crossref Citations
1. Wear glasses for supervisors to discover the beauty of subordinates: Supervisor developmental feedback and organizational ambidexterity
Canhao Wang, Hao Jiao, Jiayi Song
Journal of Business Research vol: 158 first page: 113650 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113650
2. From high-performance work systems and resilience to employee well-being during crises: exploring the moderating role of employee ambidexterity
Charles Hanu, Njabulo Khumalo
Current Psychology vol: 43 issue: 11 first page: 9955 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-05138-3
3. Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework
Kristina Stoiber, Kurt Matzler, Julia Hautz
Review of Managerial Science vol: 17 issue: 4 first page: 1439 year: 2023
doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00589-7
4. Harnessing ambidextrous leadership model for innovation and operational efficiency in technology industry
Tom Ongesa Nyamboga
Cogent Business & Management vol: 12 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2500677
5. Change in Organizational Structure Influences Perceived Leadership in a Dutch Radiotherapy Center
Rachelle Swart, Maria Jacobs, Frits Van Merode, Liesbeth Boersma
Journal of Healthcare Leadership vol: Volume 17 first page: 297 year: 2025
doi: 10.2147/JHL.S516923
6. Managing Upward and Downward Accountability Through Strategic Ambidexterity in an INGO Setting
John N. Walsh, Elaine Berkery, John Lannon
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/08997640251396026
7. Increasing organisational ambidexterity: The role of entrepreneurs’ leadership styles and individual resilience
Simona Leonelli
Journal of International Entrepreneurship vol: 22 issue: 4 first page: 433 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s10843-024-00358-5
