Original Research
The goals of manufacturing strategy, P.O.M. techniques and perceptions: A pilot study
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 24, No 4 | a877 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v24i4.877
| © 2018 D. R. Snaddon
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 1993
Submitted: 17 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 1993
About the author(s)
D. R. Snaddon, Department of Business Economics, University of the Witwatersrand, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (539KB)Abstract
Managers formulate, implement and monitor strategies to pursue their goals. Implementation is important and involves, amongst others, Production and Operations Management (P.O.M.) techniques. The purpose of this article is to study, by means of a limited sample, perceptual associations between goals of manufacturing strategy and P.O.M. techniques. An attempt is made to answer two questions in this article. The first question is which specified goals are independent of each other? The second question is which P.O.M. techniques are recommended for these independent goals? Bias and the definition of P.O.M. techniques create difficulties but pilot research indicates that some specified goals are perceived as independent. More investigation is required to verify this. Some techniques are identified with specific goals and this work should be expanded.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1537Total article views: 571
Crossref Citations
1. The manufacturing mix and consulting firms — how different are they in associating tasks with objectives?
D.Roy Snaddon
Technovation vol: 18 issue: 10 first page: 627 year: 1998
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00031-5