Original Research

TQM: The paradox of empowerment and conformance in the service sector

I. B. Hipkin
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 31, No 1 | a729 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v31i1.729 | © 2018 I. B. Hipkin | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 12 October 2018 | Published: 31 March 2000

About the author(s)

I. B. Hipkin, School of Management Studies, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (791KB)

Abstract

TQM is an appealing intervention directed at establishing improved customer service, cultural transformation, empowerment and continuous improvement, involving everyone in the organisation in an integrated effort towards enhanced performance at every level. Its appeal lies in its ability to encompass a quality programme, leading to excellence through participation. The diversity of activities done under the name of TQM is so wide that several authors have questioned whether it has an identifiable conceptual core. This presents an opportunity to managers to introduce a programme which they call 'TQM', with its attendant eminence, in order to implement changes. A paradox arises when employees are encouraged to bring forward their own solutions (empowerment), yet they are constrained by company policies, procedures, or management edicts (conformance). This study describes the implementation of TQM in a South African insurance company that wished to improve quality through empowerment. A questionnaire was administered to all members of a department involved with the TQM exercise. Wide differences in perceptions between managers, supervisors and officers were discovered. The diversity of opinions is discussed as a paradox between empowerment espoused by management and the emphasis on conformance experienced by officers.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1624
Total article views: 598

 

Crossref Citations

1. Customer service‐orientation of small retail business owners in Austria, The Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Slovakia, and Slovenia
Shawn Carraher, John A. Parnell, John E. Spillan
Baltic Journal of Management  vol: 4  issue: 3  first page: 251  year: 2009  
doi: 10.1108/17465260910990975