Original Research
Towards effective advertising regulation: A comparison of UK, Australian and South African schemes
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 33, No 4 | a706 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v33i4.706
| © 2018 D. Harker, S. Cassim
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 12 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 2002
Submitted: 12 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 2002
About the author(s)
D. Harker, Faculty of Business, University of the Sunshine Coast, AustraliaS. Cassim, University of Natal, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (507KB)Abstract
The regulation of advertising is a controversial and difficult process, and many schemes around the world opt for a self-regulatory approach to curb unacceptable advertising. However, when schemes are established or reformulated, most countries learn from other, more established, regimes. Whilst Australia and South Africa commenced the advertising self-regulation (ASR) process at similar times and based their systems on the UK model, two attempts have been made in Australia over the past three decades to produce more acceptable ads, whilst South Africa’s system has endured in its original form. This paper reviews the ASR systems in these three countries, using a macro framework for analysis which contextualises advertising in society. The systems have the fundamental process of handling complaints about advertising in common, however there are advantages and disadvantages of each and these are discussed with a view to providing some guidance for Australia’s fledgling, reformulated, system. Important insights for the development of regulation of advertising are presented.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1863Total article views: 692
Crossref Citations
1. The Imaginary Intrasexual Competition: Advertisements Featuring Provocative Female Models Trigger Women to Engage in Indirect Aggression
Sylvie Borau, Jean-François Bonnefon
Journal of Business Ethics vol: 157 issue: 1 first page: 45 year: 2019
doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3643-y