Original Research
Company failure in South Africa: Classification and prediction by means of recursive partitioning
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 37, No 4 | a609 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v37i4.609
| © 2018 B. W. Steyn-Bruwer, W. D. Hamman
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 2006
Submitted: 10 October 2018 | Published: 31 December 2006
About the author(s)
B. W. Steyn-Bruwer, Department of Accounting, University of Stellenbosch, South AfricaW. D. Hamman, University of Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (172KB)Abstract
The deficiencies in previous research on failure prediction studies were identified from the international literature. This study’s purpose is to address these deficiencies while using a new method in developing failure prediction models, namely recursive partitioning (specifically the classification tree algorithm).
The deficiencies were addressed as follows:
The deficiencies were addressed as follows:
- Brute empirism was avoided by focussing on cash flow ratios in combination with certain accrual ratios.
- Failure was not only defined as bankruptcy, but as any condition where the company cannot exist in future in its current form, therefore including delistings as well as major structural changes.
- By using the population of listed industrial companies between June 1997 and May 2002, the grey area in-between ‘successful’ and ‘bankrupt’ was included in developing the models.
- Every model developed was tested with the help of an independent sample.
- The different economic cycles were considered by developing different models for a growth and a recessionary period. A combined model was also developed, with the economic cycle as a independent dichotomous variable.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1695Total article views: 1042
Crossref Citations
1. On the relationship between financial and non-financial factors
Nigel Purves, Scott James Niblock, Keith Sloan
Agricultural Finance Review vol: 75 issue: 2 first page: 282 year: 2015
doi: 10.1108/AFR-04-2014-0007