Original Research

Collective leadership practices in plural organisations: Insights from state-owned entities in South Africa

Khathutshelo M. Ramukumba, Derick de Jongh, Sumari O’Neil
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 57, No 1 | a5469 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v57i1.5469 | © 2026 Khathutshelo M. Ramukumba, Derick de Jongh, Sumari O’Neil | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 27 June 2025 | Published: 20 February 2026

About the author(s)

Khathutshelo M. Ramukumba, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Derick de Jongh, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Sumari O’Neil, Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the social construction of collective leadership in plural organisations with South African state-owned entities (SOEs) as its setting. Adopting the social construction lens, this autoethnographic study investigated how affiliation-driven appointments and personal relationships affected leadership practice, team composition and organisational outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a qualitative approach and analysed collective leadership through multiple datasets collected from reflexive journals, self-interviews and media reports at three SOEs where the researcher occupied executive leadership roles. In-depth semi-structured interviews were also conducted with 11 participants who held senior positions in SOEs.
Findings/results: Thematic analysis revealed that affiliation-driven appointments shaped team dynamics through perceived biases, hostility and rivalries, which influenced collective leadership in SOEs. Furthermore, unresolved tensions undermined collective leadership and accountability and highlighted the interplay of micro-relational dynamics in shaping collective leadership outcomes.
Practical implications: The implications of the study highlights the need for merit-based and transparent appointment process, inclusive team practices and aligned leadership. It emphasises structured onboarding, conflict resolution and clear accountability mechanisms as key to fostering effective, collaborative leadership and improved organisational performance.
Originality/value: The study proposed three emergent strategies to address the challenges of affiliation-driven appointments: (1) strengthening merit-based appointments through transparent criteria and independent oversight, (2) fostering inclusive onboarding and conflict resolution mechanisms to build trust and team cohesion and (3) enhancing shared accountability through clear role definitions, common purpose alignment and rigorous oversight. These strategies aim to leverage collaboration and trust to promote effective collective leadership within SOEs.


Keywords

affiliation; accountability; appointments; collective leadership; South Africa; state-owned entities; performance

JEL Codes

D70: General; H83: Public Administration • Public Sector Accounting and Audits; L32: Public Enterprises • Public-Private Enterprises

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions

Metrics

Total abstract views: 325
Total article views: 446


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.