Abstract
Purpose: This paper aimed to analyse the impact of labour strikes and industry variation on the level of employee-related disclosures (ERD). It argued that the levels of ERD disclosed by companies in the chemical, manufacturing, forestry, mining, construction, and transport industries differ in accordance with the working days lost and the classification of labour strikes they are affected by.
Design/methodology/approach: The integrated reports, consisting of annual reports and sustainability reports, of 81 companies listed in 6 sectors on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2018 were sampled.
Findings/results: The study found that companies in the sampled industries respond to protracted labour strikes as per their industry disclosure norms. Further, the results indicate that the level of ERD disclosed by a company operating in the mining industry that is affected by a labour strike is significantly different from that of a company not affected by a labour strike, whether it is within the mining industry or in other industries.
Practical implications: Companies’ response to labour strikes using the ERD varies in accordance with stakeholder power and assumed rights. Moreover, institutions that issue awards for excellent Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) may award them to unworthy recipients.
Originality/value: This study examines the moderating role of labour strikes on the association between companies’ industry and level of ERD.
Keywords: employee-related disclosures; industry differences; labour strikes; normative isomorphism; stakeholder theory.
Introduction
Lonmin’s 2019 sale to Sibanye-Stillwater, following shareholder approval in December 2017, was influenced by escalating costs, financial constraints, and strained stakeholder relations (Dyer, 2017), including the aftermath of the Marikana massacre and subsequent labour strikes (Baskaran, 2021). Despite this turbulent history, Lonmin received a sustainability reporting award from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in 2015 (Cornish, 2015). This award is given to companies whose annual reports, sustainability reports and websites demonstrate clear business, social and environmental purposes, impacts and processes that are ‘mindful of broader stakeholder needs and how value creation by businesses is shared with’ all (PwC, 2019, p. 4). However, the contrasting research found Lonmin’s reports to dissociate itself from responsibility and to deflect the public’s attention to other positive information (Alves & Branco, 2020), which is consistent with Gray’s (2007) critique of the inherent difficulty in balancing sustainability disclosures with broader capitalist business objectives. The existing literature further supports this observation, with some researchers characterising sustainability reporting as a mere façade (Merkl-Davies & Brennan, 2017; Suchman, 1995).
Lonmin’s sale was partly attributed to the consequences of previous protracted labour strikes (PLSs). While the South African Labour Relations Act (LRA) 66 of 1995 does not define a protracted strike, Section 213 of the LRA defines a labour strike as:
‘[T]he partial or complete concerted refusal to work, or the retardation or obstruction of work, by persons who are or have been employed by the same employer or by different employers, for the purpose of remedying a grievance or resolving a dispute in respect of any matter of mutual interest between employer and employee …’
Protracted is defined as ‘lasting for a long time or made to last longer than necessary’ (Cambridge Dictionary, n.d.). In this study, a PLS is defined as a strike exceeding the average duration of strikes within the relevant reporting period.
This study investigates the relationship between labour strikes and employee-related disclosures (ERD), using Lonmin’s sale as a case study within six South African industries: chemicals, manufacturing, forestry, mining, construction and transport. Lonmin was listed on the South African Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) under the mining sector. This sector has seen a fair amount of research (Alves & Branco, 2020; Carels et al., 2013; Dube & Maroun, 2017); hence, this study considers the mining sector and other sectors on the JSE. The impact of labour strikes on social disclosures in annual reports has been previously discussed, with studies examining the use of voluntary disclosures to mitigate political costs and regulatory pressures (Trotman, 1979); the role of ERD within broader social reporting (Guthrie & Parker, 1989); stakeholder engagement (Unerman & Bennett, 2004); the limitations of annual reports in fully representing employee perspectives (Archel et al., 2009); and the strategic use of accounting disclosures for creating positive images by companies (Li et al., 2018; Maltby & Tsamenyi, 2010). While prior research suggests a negative (De Villiers & Van Staden, 2006) or positive (Dube & Watson, 2017) relationship between strikes and disclosure levels, this study examined this relationship across multiple industries rather than focussing on a single sector.
From a stakeholder theory perspective, the rupture of employer-employee relations during labour strikes increases the importance of balancing stakeholder power and rights in resolving conflicts and achieving organisational objectives. Deegan’s (2007) stakeholder theory distinguishes between an ethical (normative) branch and a positive (managerial) branch. The ethical branch posits fair treatment for all stakeholders, irrespective of their relative power (Deegan, 2007). Existing literature demonstrates this branch through the application of managerial discretion and professional judgement in determining the content and extent of voluntary disclosures in accounting reports (Deegan, 2007; Hope & Wang, 2018; Loliwe, 2016). Hence, employees do not control the reporting process.
The managerial branch posits that management prioritises powerful stakeholders (Nasi et al., 1997). Loliwe (2016) and Kent and Zunker (2017) examine the various forms of employee power, such as employee share ownership schemes and concentrated employee representation. Given employees’ crucial role in organisational operations (Loliwe, 2016), strikes represent a powerful tactic to influence management. Strikes negatively impact companies through lost sales, share price declines, production losses and reputational damage (Lindblom, 1993). Conversely, Delaney (1994) argues that management sometimes strategically uses a lack of funds to not meet labour or union demands, resulting in strikes or bankruptcy that reduces labour costs and increases profits. Therefore, a period of strike may favour management, employees, or both.
This study also employs institutional theory, focussing on normative isomorphism – the tendency of organisations to conform to industry norms in their policies, practices, and disclosures (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983). Normative isomorphism is driven by shared organisational values and influential actors within an industry (Markov, 2013; Omran & El-Galfy, 2014), potentially including resource constraints aimed at profit maximisation. Consequently, understanding industry values and operational contexts can provide valuable insights into collective organisational behaviour. Farooq and Maroun (2017) argue that many companies are experiencing certain pressures to issue accounting reports that are similar in structure and information disclosed, particularly among listed companies. This standardisation may be attributed to the centralised governance model inherited from pre-1994 South Africa (Maree, 2009), fostering collaboration among organisations with shared interests (Campbell, 2007; Isaacs et al., 1997), as exemplified by bodies such as the National Economic Development and Labour Council and various industry associations. Furthermore, government legislation, including the LRA, facilitates the formation and operation of these groups.
Consequently, readers may expect a flow and exchange of information. Shubham and Murty (2018) found that industrial associations encourage members to adopt similar processes and practices through activities such as standard operating procedures and self-monitoring. Normative isomorphism is crucial to explain industries’ collective behaviour, especially when seeking legitimacy, signalling value propositions, or hiding social liability from the public. Based on this reasoning, this study argues that the levels of ERD disclosed by companies that are affected by PLSs are significantly different from those companies in another industry.
Literature review
Research on labour strikes
The Department of Labour annually publishes the Industrial Action Report (hereafter called the Report). The information these reports contain is broad, but they are useful because they outline the causes of labour strikes, such as wage disputes, grievances, working conditions, retrenchments, longitudinal trends and the number of work stoppages in South Africa annually (DoL, 2012). For example, the 2012 Report highlights the role of National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) and rival unions in the 2012 mining sector strike, while downplaying the underlying grievances of employees, the actions of the employers, and Chamber of Mines in escalating tensions. Hence, researchers such as Archel et al. (2009) and Mäkelä (2013) warn users about reporting bias against employees that usually occurs because of power imbalances in most reports. For instance, the significant omission was that the 2012 strike at Lonmin led to the killing of 44 of its Marikana miners by the police (SAFLII, 2014).
In the global context, international comparison studies have been done on working days lost (Monger, 2020; Stokke & Thornqvist, 2001). However, Lyddon (2007) rejects these studies because of inaccuracies and inconsistencies. Therefore, this study focussed only on South Africa. In South Africa, the literature on the number of working days lost by companies (or industries) mainly focusses on longitudinal trends, duration, and causes of disputes and labour strikes (Jacobs & Yu, 2013). Researchers recently examined the impact of labour strikes on the economy and shareholder value (Kennedy, 2018; Williams, 2017). An important study by Russo et al. (2019) developed a framework to explain pre-existing economic and legal conditions, including mechanisms for resolving disputes associated with starting and preventing labour strikes. Their framework highlights the interaction between workers, the industry they are employed in and the macroeconomic context of a country as associated with quick resolutions or prolonging of strikes.
Other researchers have examined PLSs, which makes this topic not new in academic literature. For instance, firstly, there was a labour strike in 1921 for 80 days in West Coast Maritime (Brown, 1950); secondly, the Major League Baseball players had a strike that lasted for 50 days in 1981; thirdly, Delhi University in the 1990s had two strikes that lasted 110 and 90 days, respectively (Altbach, 2003); fourthly, the health worker strikes in Kenya in 2017 had labour strikes that lasted 100 and 150 days (Waithaka et al., 2020); and lastly, in 2014, the platinum sector in South Africa experienced a 5-month-long labour strike. Therefore, this study first seeks to establish whether the levels of ERD by companies within the same industry and in other industries differ based on the labour strike’s classification (i.e. PLS and no PLS) and thus the following were hypothesised:
H1: The level of ERD disclosed by a company that is affected by a protracted (i.e. longer than necessary) labour strike is significantly different from a company in the same industry that is not affected by any labour strike.
H2: The level of ERD disclosed by a company that is affected by a protracted (i.e. longer than necessary) labour strike is significantly different from a company in another industry that is not affected by any labour strike.
Why South African companies?
This study focusses on South African companies for several compelling reasons. Firstly, the JSE is the largest in Africa and ranks 17th globally by market capitalisation (SSE, n.d.), highlighting South Africa’s significant role within the top 40 global economies (UN, 2024). Secondly, South Africa boasts a high level of unionisation, ranking 4th in Africa and 25th globally in 2019 (ILO, 2022). This high unionisation rate, while potentially leading to labour strikes and work stoppages (Ashenfelter & Johnson, 1969; Webster, 2022), also underscores the importance of labour relations in resolving disputes and addressing grievances (LRA, 1995; ILO, 2022).
Furthermore, the JSE’s implementation of the Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Index in 2004, later merged with the FTSE Russell Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) index in 2015, emphasises the growing significance of ESG considerations in investment decisions (JSE, n.d.). Research suggests that companies with strong ESG scores attract investors because of their lower risk profiles (Sgammini, 2023; Tripathi & Kaur, 2020). Therefore, examining labour value creation, risk management and stakeholder relationships in South African companies is crucial, given their historical impact on economic and social stability (Marais et al., 2022).
Employee-related disclosures
‘Human capital’ (HC) as a concept has existed since Adam Smith’s time (1776). According to Goldin (2016), ‘human capital is the stock of skills that the labour force possesses’. Although the accounting profession, via the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) conceptual framework, has desisted from putting a value on human beings because of their elusive manner of being controlled and the difficulty they may present when measuring (Eckstein, 2004), except for costs paid to people that are directly attributable to the creation of assets, as explicitly addressed in IAS 38 Intangible Assets and other accounting standards. Some researchers, including Wößmann (2003), and sustainability standards-setting bodies, such as the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, have devised methods to measure HC. These methods differ based on what is being measured, why they are measuring what they are measuring and their data requirements. The second focus of this study is not to measure HC but to examine whether labour strikes have a moderating effect on the relationship between an industry variable and HC reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) literature uses several terms for HC reporting. For example, Guthrie and Parker (1989) called it human resources disclosures. The following paragraphs demonstrate that regardless of the title of these disclosures, they cover similar subjects that concern employees.
In the early 2000s and before, HC reporting was driven by laws (Buhmann, 2006). However, McCracken et al. (2018) found that most companies increase their HC reporting to go beyond their statutory duties and to broader employee-related issues. Furthermore, Lim and Mali (2022) compared the HC information of companies in the United Kingdom and South Korea; they found that South Korean companies have higher levels of HC reporting on their annual reports than UK companies. Therefore, they suggest that South Korean companies seek to legitimise their interactions with their employees to the users of their annual reports (Lim & Mali, 2022).
Other research on HC focusses on the strategies companies apply after labour strikes and assesses labour strikes as one of the factors that influence social disclosures (Alves & Branco, 2020; Archel et al., 2009; Dube & Maroun, 2017). For instance, Loliwe (2016) found that labour strikes do not significantly affect social disclosures. Another study conducted by Alves and Branco (2020) found that a company’s labour unionisation influences managers to publish CSR information to gain positive social perceptions. They also found that Lonmin increased the disclosure of health and safety and labour relations information in its reports (Alves & Branco, 2020). In contrast, Bulut-Sürdü et al. (2020) found that employee training was the most disclosed item among HC disclosures in corporate reports of insurance companies in Turkey. Therefore, it appears that companies operating in specific industries may prioritise different information to be reported as compared to companies in other industries.
Dube and Maroun (2017) investigated how mining companies use CSR disclosures in their integrated reports to preserve credibility in their constituents’ minds after violent strike action has threatened the companies’ legitimacy. Their study focussed on the integrated reports for 2011, 2012 and 2013 of JSE-listed mining companies. They found that South African platinum mining companies provided additional CSR disclosures, including information about the strike at Lonmin that led to the Marikana massacre (Dube & Maroun, 2017). Prior to the earlier-mentioned study, some researchers found a significant relationship between the industry in which a company operates and its social disclosures (Boesso & Kumar, 2007; Cuganesan et al., 2010). However, can this relationship be influenced by different durations and classifications of labour strikes? This study, secondly, seeks to confirm whether ERD differs between companies operating in the chemical, construction, forestry, manufacturing, mining and transport industries in relation to durations and classifications of labour strikes they had, and the following was hypothesised:
H3: A labour strike and its classification significantly moderate the relationship between an industry in which a company operates and its ERD.
Other perspectives that explain social disclosures
As a part of the social disclosures, Guidry and Patten (2012) discuss the signalling effect, which means that when a company has better environmental performance, it will disclose more information; in contrast, when a company is performing poorly, management may decide not to disclose negative information about the company or themselves. Thus, what is disclosed or not disclosed differs from what has occurred, which leads to information asymmetry. Stiglitz (2003) defines information asymmetry as the condition where certain information is known to some parties involved but not to all. De Villiers and Van Staden (2006) confirm that certain companies withheld information in their study. The new trend is to apply information asymmetry arguments to social and environmental studies, including labour strikes (García-Sánchez & Noguera-Gámez, 2017; Nguyen et al., 2019). Cormier et al. (2009) and García-Sánchez and Noguera-Gámez (2017) and Nguyen et al. (2019) found that when companies disclose social and environmental information, information asymmetry is reduced. Moreover, many studies have been written about the signalling effect. Hetze (2016) argues that CSR reporting impacts the CSR reputation of a company. Nonetheless, in practice, disclosures alone do not guarantee the ongoing survival of a company, as we have seen with Lonmin.
Methodology
Research method
Firstly, to establish whether there are differences in the levels of ERD by companies that had PLSs and those that did not have protracted strikes within the same industry (i.e. H1) and in other industries (i.e. H2), this study applied the Mann–Whitney U formula. In the formula, U1 represents the Mann–Whitney U test outcome for companies with PLSs in group 1 that was compared with the Mann–Whitney U test outcome for those companies without PLSs in group 2 in the same or other industries. Furthermore, n1 and n2 represent the number of companies in group 1 and group 2, respectively. R1 represents the sum of the ranks for companies in group 1. The reasons for applying this test are that some groups had fewer than 15 observations, significant outliers, and were not normally distributed (Appendix 2 Table 6A; Appendix 2 Table 6B; Lund Research, 2018). Therefore, this test has fewer restrictions and would provide better results when examining small, unequal samples (Zimmerman, 1987).
Secondly, to examine the moderating effect of (1) working days lost because of labour strikes and (2) the classification of labour strikes on the relationship between an industry in which a company operates and its ERD, this study used Hayes Model 2 and Model 3 for moderation analysis because they are used by researchers, such as Mullins et al. (2014) and Pham et al. (2019).
Measures and validity
The variables used in Model 2 were the following: Discl (i.e. ERD) represents the total word count of ERD-related citations or references across integrated, annual, and standalone sustainability reports. The justification for examining these reports is that they are considered credible sources of both financial and employee-related non-financial information (Caglio et al., 2019, cited in International Integrated Framework Council, 2013; Williams & Adams, 2013). Strike represents the number of working days lost because of a labour strike in a company. Industry (i.e. the sector under which a company is listed on the JSE) represents a category variable in which 1 is chemical, 2 is construction, 3 is forestry, 4 is manufacturing, 5 is mining and 6 is transport. Furthermore, PLS represents a dummy variable, which is equal to 0 for companies that did not have protracted strikes and 1 for companies that have lost at least 12 working days because of strikes. Industry x Strike represents the interaction between the number of working days lost because of a labour strike and a company’s industry. Industry x PLS represents the interaction between a dummy variable for a PLS and a company’s industry. In addition to the above-stated variables, Model 3 extended Model 2 by incorporating the following two interactions. Strike x PLS represents the interaction between the number of working days lost because of a labour strike and a dummy variable for a PLS. Industry x Strike x PLS represents the interaction between the number of working days lost because of a labour strike, a dummy variable for a PLS and a company’s industry.
Consistent with previous studies that have examined ERD, this study added several control variables in Figure 1 as well as in the earlier-mentioned moderation equations. These are media computed as the ratio of number of times a company’s name appears in the sampled newspaper articles to the total number of text or words in the specified period’s newspaper articles (Pollach, 2014); employees represents the total number of employees from the sampled company (Kent & Zunker, 2017); leverage is computed as the ratio of a company’s total debt to total assets (Sierra et al., 2013); revenue computed by dividing the company’s revenue by its number of employees (Khaveh et al., 2012); and Dir_sh is measured by the percentage of ordinary shares and other shares held by the chief executive officer (CEO) and executive directors (Loliwe, 2016). BEE_score represents BEE ratings from the Empowerdex, and if a company was not reported in the BEE rating list, its BEE score was set as zero (Loliwe, 2016); ROA is computed as the ratio of profits/(loss) for the year to total assets (Sierra et al., 2013); and cash_debt is computed as the ratio of cash generated from operations to total debt (Benjamin et al., 2020).
For validity, the following tests were performed: The researcher selected data points at the 16th, 50th, and 84th percentiles of the distributions of Strike and PLS variables to examine when these variables moderate the ERD of the sampled companies (Hayes, 2018). The 84th percentile data point of the Strike variable equalled 12 working days, which was selected to be a criterion for categorising a labour strike as protracted. Also, all the variables have been mean-centred at a 95% confidence interval (CI) (Hayes, 2018). Other tests performed included correlation, R-squared, plotting graphs, skewness, and bootstrapping.
Sample
This study examined six industries that had the highest number of working days lost because of strikes in 2009, as indicated in the 2009 report (DoL, 2009). These industries include the chemical, construction, forestry, manufacturing, mining and transport sectors. However, this study excluded the community services sector, which the government mainly funds and runs (Figure 2; Moolman & Van der Waldt, 2022).
 |
FIGURE 2: Working days lost in sampled industries. |
|
The initial sample comprised 143 JSE-listed companies across the selected industries from 2010 to 2018. However, companies whose integrated or standalone sustainability reports could not be obtained and those not listed for the entire 9-year period were excluded. Furthermore, three other issues have been considered. Firstly, in 2012, there was a huge increase in the number of working days lost (i.e. an increase of 1563%) in the selected industries (Figure 2). Therefore, the sample period in this study started two financial periods before 2012 for comparative purposes. Secondly, if the sample period was pushed to the years before 2010, the reporting periods after 2008 (i.e. 2009) were possibly biased against ERD because of the 2008 global financial crisis (Cohen et al., 2008; Mäkelä, 2013). Thirdly, the sample period ended in 2018 because some companies, including Lonmin, were delisted from the JSE in 2019. This would have meant excluding those companies from the study if the sample period had extended beyond 2018. Regardless, by examining 9 years, this study goes a step further than other studies for social disclosures (Brown & Deegan, 1998; Dube & Maroun, 2017; Hill & Maroun, 2015; Li et al., 2018; Loliwe, 2016) that analysed 5-year periods. Therefore, the final sample contains 81 companies, which resulted in 729 observations. This sample represented 24.7% of the companies listed on the JSE and approximately 30.0% of its market capitalisation (PwC, 2011; SARB, 2020).
Data collection
For the data about the industries the sampled companies are listed on, this study relied on the classifications from the IRESS database, JSE and Top Empowered Companies’ Reports on the Empowerdex website. While ERD information was obtained from the integrated reports of the sampled companies by an NVivo text search, which used a classification list, such as that of Loliwe (2016), that contained words and phrases (i.e. text units) associated with ERD. Loliwe’s (2016) list is comprehensive because it considers classification lists by Boesso and Kumar (2007), Kuasirikun and Sherer (2004), the SRI Index and the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines (Appendix 1), which South African listed companies highly rate. NVivo software efficiently manages large amounts of data (Dollah et al., 2017). However, the researcher noticed that the speed of the text searches when he was performing long text searches was influenced by his computer’s speed and internal memory.
The data concerning labour strikes were initially hand-collected through reading the accounting reports of the sampled companies and the reports for each of the sampled years (DoL, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014a, 2014b, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018). Later, the researcher searched for the terms ‘industrial action’, ‘days lost’, ‘strike’, ‘protest’, and ‘unrest’ using NVivo. Consequently, he read the text search results to find the number of working days lost because of labour strikes. One challenge in collecting labour strike data was when the number of working days lost was not mentioned in the reports, and to remedy this, the researcher searched the internet for news on those companies’ labour strike details to estimate the number of working days lost.
Moreover, where data could not be obtained from the IRESS database and top empowered companies’ reports, the affected control variables were manually computed using the information presented in respective companies’ accounting reports. These include the media variable, which was determined using text searches performed on the newspaper articles from Sabinet SA Media from 2009 to 2019. Therefore, the researcher searched for several terms, such as ‘manufacturing’, ‘coal’, ‘metals’, ‘mining’, ‘industrial’, ‘Nampak’, and so forth, relating to the sampled JSE sectors and 81 company names, and the search results were displayed by their relevance. Thereafter, the higher of 25% of the articles found (rounded to the next 10) and the first 200 articles were downloaded for each year of the 11 years. This means that, in total, 2510 articles were downloaded (Table 2). Thereafter, they were loaded onto NVivo software for text searching for sampled companies’ names and classified in relation to the years they relate to. Then, the number of times a company’s name was mentioned in these newspaper articles was counted and recorded in Excel next to the relevant company’s name over the 9 years. Because of the lagging effect of and overlap of financial periods over calendar years for the preparation of accounting reports (Deegan et al., 2002), the text search and counting for each year covered articles for 3 years (i.e. equal to the preceding, current and following years).
Ethical considerations
Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the University of Dundee, School of Business, School Research Ethics Committee (No. UoD-SoB-STAFF-2023-16).
Results
Descriptive statistics, assumptions, and correlations
Table 1 shows that the industry with the most sampled companies is the manufacturing industry (43.2%), and with the least is the forestry industry (2.4%). This is reflective of the composition of these sectors and their classification on the JSE. Furthermore, Table 3 presents the descriptive statistics with means, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values. Consistent with Kansal et al. (2014), Discl is positively skewed, meaning that most of the sampled companies disclosed less than the expected average of ERD. In addition, the sampled companies annually lost, on average, eight working days because of labour strikes over the sampled period. While companies without protracted strikes (i.e. No PLS) and those with PLS in the sampled industries were 83.5% and 16.5%, respectively (Table 4). This implies that PLS are rare because of the divisions among unions, efficiency of collective bargaining, fear of dismissal, and unemployment (Bolt & Rajak, 2016; Joyce, 2015).
TABLE 1: Companies in sampled industries (left) mapped to Johannesburg Stock Exchange’s classifications (right). |
TABLE 2: Calculation of newspaper articles that were selected. |
TABLE 3: Descriptive statistics (N = 729). |
TABLE 4: Classification of labour strikes. |
Table 5 shows that the industry in which a company operates, labour strikes and their classification, media, number of employees and directors’ shareholding had significant correlations with the level of ERD by a company. Therefore, it should be expected that these correlations would weaken the R-squares for the moderation regressions, even though the strike variable (i.e. the number of working days lost because of labour strikes) and PLS (i.e. the classification of labour strikes) show no statistically significant correlation.
TABLE 5: Pearson correlation and ETA statistics. |
Lastly, the assumptions of the Mann–Whitney U tests were met concerning continuous dependent variables and the grouping of independent variables into two categories, which must be independently observed (Lund Research, 2018).
In Table 3, the variance inflation factor (VIF) values show no multicollinearity. However, other assumptions were violated because there were correlated residuals (Durbin–Watson statistic = 0.673), non-linear relationships between ERD and other variables, heteroscedasticity and extreme outliers (Appendix 2). The discussion on tests performed in addressing these issues is presented in Section ‘Validity tests’.
Determining the differences in employee-related disclosures
Table 6Aa and Table 6B present groups of companies with PLS under Group A and those of companies without PLS under Group B in each of the six industries. The samples in these groups vary from 2 to 272 observations. After applying the formula for the Mann–Whitney U test to Groups A and B in each of the industries, the results were statistically significantly different for companies in the mining industry at the 0.05 level (p < 0.001; Table 6A), which means a mining company that was affected by a protracted strike disclosed significantly higher ERD than a mining company that was not affected by a PLS, and therefore, H1 is supported. This finding seems true considering the research by Dube and Maroun (2017) and Alves and Branco (2020) regarding the mining industry.
TABLE 6A: Results of Mann–Whitney U test (comparison in the same industry). |
TABLE 6B: Results of Mann–Whitney U test (comparison with other industries). |
Furthermore, the same formula for the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to companies grouped in Table 6B. This study compared companies that were affected by a protracted (i.e. longer than necessary) strike under Group A to companies in other industries that were not affected by any protracted strike under Group B. The results show that, on average, companies in the mining industry when affected by protracted strikes disclosed statistically significantly higher ERD than companies that were not affected by protracted strikes in five other industries (p = 0.002 chemical, p < 0.001 construction, p = 0.045 forestry, p < 0.001 manufacturing, and p < 0.001 transport). Therefore, H2 is supported. Also, there were mixed significant differences in ERD by companies in the manufacturing industry that had PLS as compared to companies in other industries.
Moderating effect of labour strikes
Table 7 presents the results for Model 2 and Model 3, using unadjusted data. These models analyse the relationship between industry, labour strikes, control variables and ERD, using unadjusted data. Under Model 2, firstly, companies in the transport industry disclosed statistically significantly lower ERD compared to those in the reference industry (chemical industry) (β = –455.435, p = 0.025).
Secondly, there was a statistically significant negative relationship between working days lost and ERD when an industry variable was not specified (β = –6.235, p = 0.046). This suggests that companies which experienced strikes tended to disclose less ERD information. Thirdly, the interaction between the mining industry and strike was statistically significant (β = 11.784, p = 0.001) as compared to companies in the reference industry. This indicates that the influence of the industry variable on ERD was statistically significantly moderated by the occurrence of labour strikes in the mining sector. This finding is further supported by the 0.9% increase in R-squared (∆R2 = 0.009) when working days lost because of a labour strike are included in Model 2. Therefore, H3 is supported. Unlike previous studies that found a direct relationship between an industry in which a company operates and social disclosures (Boesso & Kumar, 2007; Cuganesan et al., 2010), these results indicate that, in South Africa, the relationship between a company’s industry and its level of ERD is conditional on whether it had a labour strike or not.
Conversely, the moderating effect of labour strikes on ERD by companies operating in four other industries (i.e. construction, forestry, manufacturing, and transport sectors) was not found to be statistically significant. Therefore, the moderation effects of labour strikes on ERD may be industry-specific. Similarly, the classification of a labour strike as a PLS did not lead to any statistically significant moderation differences. Fourthly, some control variables had a statistically significant influence on ERD. For instance, media (p < 0.001), employees (p < 0.001), and BEE_score (p = 0.004) had positive relationships. Conversely, Dir-ow (p = 0.015) had a negative sign.
The analysis of conditional effects concerning the transport industry was addressed in the first paragraph of this section. Now, continuing with the third finding at the top of this section regarding the mining industry, this study further examined the ERD in the mining industry in terms of how many working days were lost and which classification of the labour strike that might have moderated the ERD.
Therefore, between 0 and 12 working days were lost, and when a classification for PLS variable is 0, companies in the mining industry statistically significantly increased their ERD by 414.223 phrases (p = 0.026) compared to those in the reference industry (Table 8).
To visualise this, Table 9 shows three conditions of labour strikes that were tested: (1) Employee-related disclosures reported during periods without any labour strike, (2) Employee-related disclosures reported during periods with labour strikes lasting less than 12 working days (i.e. between 0 and 12 working days were lost), and (3) Employee-related disclosures reported during periods with PLS. Therefore, Table 10 presents data generated by SPSS using data at the 16th, 50th, and 84th percentiles for industry, strike, PLS, and ERD variables. However, because of the skewed distribution of the original data, the 16th percentile information was excluded from this analysis, as it was the same as the 50th percentile values. Lastly, Figure 3 contains two graphs with the conditional effects of working days lost because of labour strikes on ERD. The top graph shows that when there were no labour strikes, companies in the forestry sectors disclosed the highest ERD. However, when there were labour strikes for less than 12 working days, companies in the mining sector increased their ERD, while companies in the forestry sector decreased their ERD.
TABLE 9: Three conditions of labour strikes a company may experience. |
TABLE 10: SPSS data points at 50th and 84th percentiles. |
 |
FIGURE 3: Moderating effects of the durations and classification of labour strikes on employee-related disclosures. |
|
In the bottom graph, the dashed line is for PLS (12 days or longer). Here, companies in the forestry sector further decreased their ERD, while the mining companies maintained the same level of ERD regardless of the classification of the labour strike. Interestingly, some companies in the chemical industry did disclose increased ERD when affected by PLS compared to companies in other industries. This is because different industries and companies are structured and operate differently, from top management to floor workers. Furthermore, each strike has unique features, such as its causes, nature, length, and how management plans to resolve it, which may not exist in other companies or industries. This supports normative isomorphism, where ERD are influenced by industry-related practices, management responses, and strategic intentions (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Shubham & Murty, 2018; Unerman & Bennett, 2004). However, the solid line that shows zero working days were lost because of strikes and there were PLS needs to be ignored because it is unrealistic.
Validity tests
In this section, the three methods used to correct the violated assumptions and their findings are discussed. The first adjustment performed was to mean-centre all the variables in Model 2 before it was re-run to improve the validity of the results. The second adjustment was to transform the values for strike variable using logs to fix non-linearity.
This is because, in Table 3, the strike is skewed to the right. However, to avoid the misuse of statistical tools, the researcher decided against the idea of removing outliers and adjusting unimportant variables to this study’s aim (Gardenier & Resnik, 2002). The third adjustment was to apply a heteroscedasticity-consistent standard error estimator called HC3 to correct heteroscedasticity because the observations tested in this study are over 250 (Long & Ervin, 2000). Therefore, Model 2 regression was re-performed with the above additions. Concerning Model 3, there were no results produced for the first adjustment; hence, no further analysis was performed with it.
In Table 11 (column 1), the results show that three direct effects and one control variable were statistically significant, two had negative coefficients, and others were positive. In addition to earlier results for the unadjusted Model 2 data, the variables for the manufacturing sector and revenue were now statistically significant. However, the effect of the industry variable on the mining companies’ ERD was not moderated by working days lost as before. Next, in Table 11 (column 2) the results are similar to the results for the unadjusted Model 2 data. Besides that, the BEE_score and Dir_sh variables lost their significance, whereas revenue became statistically significant. Lastly, in Table 11 (column 3), the results show an extra finding for moderated effects, which is that the strike variable statistically significantly moderates the effect of the industry variable on the ERD of companies in the transport industry. Overall, the results in Table 11 and their R2 appear to be superior when compared to those based on the original data, but at the expense of reducing the original observations by 537.
TABLE 11: Results of revised Hayes Model 2. The results in (1) have mean-centred data, (2) are based on a log-transformed moderator for working days lost, and (3) are mean-centred, homoscedastic, and used a log-transformed moderator for working days lost. |
Concluding discussion
This study examined the influence and moderating effects of labour strikes on the ERD of the companies listed in six JSE industries from 2010 to 2018, and its findings revealed three key insights. Firstly, using the Mann–Whitney U tests, this study found conflicting results because companies in different industries exhibit different responses to PLS. This contrast was found in companies in the transport industry, which did not disclose statistically significantly different ERD, and those in the mining industry disclosed statistically significantly higher ERD. This suggests that the sampled companies adhere to their industries’ norms regarding disclosing ERD, even during disruptive labour events (Alves & Branco, 2020; DiMaggio & Powell, 1983). Therefore, readers may find it difficult to determine whether different industries’ reports constitute a public relations exercise or demonstrate genuine improvements in their practices and employee conditions.
Secondly, contrary to existing literature that indicates that ERD and labour strikes are not correlated (Guthrie & Parker, 1989; Loliwe, 2016), Model 2 results showed a statistically significant negative relationship between labour strikes and ERD (β = –1130.792, p = 0.025), regardless of an industry. For example, the chemical and forestry industries reported less ERD than other industries when they had labour strikes, which were not classified as protracted. Further evidence showed that the transport industry lost the fewest working days because of labour strikes; hence, it did not have any reason to disclose more ERD than desired because its employees were not powerful stakeholders. Similarly, the companies listed in the manufacturing industry maintained the same level of ERD when they had PLS and when they did not have labour strikes (Figure 3). Therefore, reducing ERD is one way which companies used to maintain their legitimacy (De Villiers & Van Staden, 2006). Equally, these industries did not want public scrutiny (Deegan, 2007) and adopted a strategy to distance themselves from labour disruptions that happened (Lindblom, 1993).
Thirdly, this study found that labour strikes significantly moderated the ERD of companies in the mining industry. Two theories that seem to capture this phenomenon well are the managerial branch of the stakeholder theory and the signalling effect in the voluntary disclosure theory. In this case, the former suggests that the management of the companies in the mining industry were influenced by employees’ power to increase ERD during labour strikes (Deegan, 2007). While the latter proposes that some mining companies differentiated themselves from others by demonstrating that they had excellent relationships with their employees and good policies for them (Isaacs et al., 1997; Hetze, 2016).
Accordingly, this study extends our knowledge by examining the differing levels of ERD in companies operating in several industries (Boesso & Kumar, 2007; Cuganesan et al., 2010) based on the presence of PLSs and the moderating effects of labour strikes on the relationship between an industry a company is operating in and its ERD (Dube & Maroun, 2017; Loliwe, 2016). Regarding the former, the findings specifically show that when there are PLSs compared to no PLSs, the effect of industry variations in ERD characterises normative isomorphism. Regarding the latter, they show that the effect of the mining industry variable is positively statistically significant on ERD when labour strikes affect companies operating in that industry. This depicts the managerial branch of the stakeholder theory. Also, examining the moderation effect of labour strikes differentiates this study from the existing literature that mainly examines the direct influence of labour strikes on ERD.
The earlier-discussed findings have implications for institutions that award companies for excellent CSR reporting, such as PricewaterhouseCoopers. These institutions may need to be highly vigilant when reviewing social disclosures of companies in the running for their awards. By improving their review procedures, they may better identify differences in CSR reporting that reflect or do not reflect such companies’ conduct, thereby preventing undeserving companies from receiving awards.
However, this study has the following limitations: Firstly, the word count of cited words used to determine the variables for ERD and media ignores the context in which counted words are used, photographs and charts within accounting reports, as well as the length or proportion of words counted. Hence, the author had to review the text search results and manually exclude and include specific citations found by NVivo that met the above-stated limitations. Secondly, on a few occasions, NVivo could not read documents, or information could not be found, which forced authors to read, record, and calculate variables manually. This process might have led to errors. However, because of the amount of time the authors spent on this study, such concerns would have been found and corrected to a minimum. Thirdly, this study focussed on companies listed in limited industries on the JSE, which means the readers must take care when generalising the results in other jurisdictions and industries. Fourthly, annual and integrated reports are not the only source of information used by researchers and other stakeholders seeking to learn about companies’ reporting practices and social performance.
Lastly, this study’s data collection ended in 2018, and at the end of 2024, the amended Companies Act of 2008 requirements concerning ERD for listed companies remain unchanged. However, amendments to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, Employment Equity Act, Occupational Health and Safety Act, Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, Skills Development Act, Pension Funds Act, International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) Framework, and the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals, among others, will impact the content of ERD and present a limitation to this study’s results. These changes include a growing trend of applying for exemptions from establishing a social and ethics committee through the Companies Tribunal (2023). Therefore, future studies could extend the sample period and data sources.
Acknowledgements
I want to thank Ms. K. Hurter for her editing services. I also thank Dr. R. Cordina, Dr. A.H. Ahmed, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Competing interests
The author declares that there are no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced him in writing this article.
Author’s contributions
T.L. is the sole author of this research article.
Funding information
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, T.L., upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are the product of professional research. The article does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder or agency, or that of the publisher. The author is responsible for this article’s results, findings and content.
References
Altbach, P.G. (2003). Centers and peripheries in the academic profession: The special challenges of developing countrieṣ. In P.G. Altbach (Ed.), The decline of the Guru (pp. 1–21). Palgrave MacMillan.
Alves, A.F., & Branco, M.C. (2020). Lonmin CSR reporting practices and the Marikana Massacre. Journal of Sustainability Research, 4(3), 1–24.
Archel, P., Husillos, J., Larrinaga, C., & Spence, C. (2009). Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1284–1307. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910999319
Ashenfelter, O., & Johnson, G.E. (1969). Bargaining theory, trade unions, and industrial strike activity. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 35–49.
Baskaran, G. (2021). Firms’ approach to mitigating risks in the platinum group metals sector. Mineral Economics, 34, 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-021-00249-4
Benjamin, S.J., Regasa, D.G., Wellalage, N.H., & M Marathamuthu, M.S. (2020). Waste disclosure and corporate cash holdings. Applied Economics, 52(49), 5399–5412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1764480
Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States, P.W. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20, 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710741028
Bolt, M., & Rajak, D. (2016). Introduction: Labour, insecurity and violence in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 42(5), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2016.1232513
Botha, M.M. (2015). Responsible unionism during collective bargaining and industrial action: Are we ready yet? De Jure.
Brown, G.T. (1950). The West Coast phase of the maritime strike of 1921. Pacific Historical Review, 19(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/3635820
Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information – A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564
Buhmann, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: What role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700610655187
Bulut-Sürdü, F., Özsözgün Çalışkan, A., & Esen, E. (2020). Human resource disclosures in corporate annual reports of insurance companies: A case of developing country. Sustainability, 12(8), 3452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083452
Caglio, A., Melloni, G., & Perego, P. (2020). Informational content and assurance of textual disclosures: Evidence on integrated reporting. European Accounting Review, 29(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1677486
Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Protracted. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/protracted#dataset_cald4
Campbell, J.L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Carels, C., Maroun, W., & Padia, N. (2013). Integrated reporting in the South African mining sector. Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(1), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i1c11p6
Cohen, D.A., Dey, A., & Lys, T.Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.757
Companies Tribunal. (2023). Annual report 2022/23. Retrieved from https://www.companiestribunal.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Companies_Tribunal_Annual_Report_final_2022-23.pdf
Cormier, D., Aerts, W., Ledoux, M.J., & Magnan, M. (2009). Attributes of social and human capital disclosure and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 26(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.89
Cornish, L. (2015). Lonmin commended for sustainability reporting. Retrieved from https://www.miningreview.com/top-stories/lonmin-commended-for-sustainability-reporting/
Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., & Ward, L. (2010). Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum, 34(3–4), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.07.001
De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C.J. (2006). Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.001
Deegan, C. (2007). Financial accounting theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5(3), 312–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861
Delaney, K.J. (1994). The organizational construction of the “bottom line”. Social Problems, 41(4), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096986
Department of Labour (DoL). (2009). Annual Industrial Action Report 2009. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2009/Industrial%20Action%20Report%20part%201.2009.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2010). Annual Industrial Action Report 2010. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/industrial-action-report-2011revised0.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2011). Annual Industrial Action Report 2011. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2011/web%20IA%202012_e.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2012). Annual Industrial Action Report 2012. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/industrialreport2012a.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2013). Annual Industrial Action Report 2013. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2013/industrialactionreport2013.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2014a). Industrial Action Report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2014/industrialaction2014_part1.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2014b). Industrial Action Report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2014/industrialaction2014_part2.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2015). Industrial Action Report 2015. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2015/industrualaction_2015.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2016). Industrial Action Report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2016/industrialaction2016_.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2017). Industrial Action Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2017/iar2017.pdf
Department of Labour (DoL). (2018). Industrial Action Report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Reports/Annual%20Reports/Industrial%20Action%20Annual%20Report/2018/Industrial%20Action%20Report%202018.pdf
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dollah, S., Abduh, A., & Rosmaladewi, R., (2017). Benefits and drawbacks of NVivo QSR application, In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Science, and Technology (ICEST), 149, 61–63. https://doi.org/10.2991/icest-17.2017.21
Dube, S., & Maroun, W. (2017). Corporate social responsibility reporting by South African mining companies: Evidence of legitimacy theory. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i1.17
Dyer, R. (2017). Lonmin agrees to be taken over by South African miner Sabanye-Stillwater, Proactive. Retrieved from https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/188793/lonmin-agrees-to-be-taken-over-by-south-african-miner-sabanye-stillwater-188793.html
Eckstein, C. (2004). The measurement and recognition of intangible assets: Then and now. Accounting Forum, 28(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.02.001
Farooq, M.B., & Maroun, W. (2017). Why organizations voluntarily report–institutional theory and institutional work. In C. Villiers & W. Maroun (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and integrated reporting (pp. 36–48). Routledge.
García-Sánchez, I.M., & Noguera-Gámez, L. (2017). Integrated reporting and stakeholder engagement: The effect on information asymmetry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(5), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1415
Gardenier, J., & Resnik, D. (2002). The misuse of statistics: Concepts, tools, and a research agenda. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 9(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620212968
Goldin, C. (2016). Human capital. In C. Diebolt & M. Haupert (Eds.), Handbook of Cliometrics (pp. 55–86). Springer.
Gray, R. (2007). Taking a long view on what we now know about social and environmental accountability and reporting. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 1(2), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v1i2.13
Guidry, R.P., & Patten, D.M. (2012). Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research. Accounting Forum, 36(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.03.002
Guthrie, J. & Parker, L.D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863
Hayes, A.F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
Hetze, K. (2016). Effects on the (CSR) reputation: CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories. Corporate Reputation Review, 19(3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3
Hill, N., & Maroun, W. (2015). Assessing the potential impact of the Marikana incident on South African mining companies: An event method study. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 18(4), 586–607. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v18i4.1345
Hope, O.K., & Wang, J. (2018). Management deception, big-bath accounting, and information asymmetry: Evidence from linguistic analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.02.004
International Integrated Framework Council. (2013). The International Integrated Framework. The International Integrated Reporting Council (‘the IIRC’).
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). Social Dialogue Report: Collective bargaining for an inclusive, sustainable and resilient recovery. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_842807.pdf
Isaacs, E., Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., & O’Conaill, B. (1997). Informal communication re-examined: New functions for video in supporting opportunistic encounters. Video-mediated Communication, 997, 459–485.
Jacobs, T., & Yu, D. (2013). An overview of strike activities in South Africa, 1999–2011. Working paper. University of Cape Town.
Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). (n.d.). FTSE/JSE responsible investment index series. Retrieved from https://www.jse.co.za/services/indices/ftsejse-responsible-investment-index
Joyce, S. (2015). Why are there so few strikes. International Socialism, 145(Winter). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj2/2015/isj2-145/joyce.html
Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G.S. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2014.03.009
Kennedy, J.D. (2018). The effect of labour unrest on shareholder value in the South African platinum industry 2009 to 2016. Working paper. University of Johannesburg.
Kent, P., & Zunker, T. (2017). A stakeholder analysis of employee disclosures in annual reports. Accounting and Finance, 57(2), 533–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12153
Khaveh, A., Nikhasemi, S. R., Haque, A., & Yousefi, A. (2012). Voluntary sustainability disclosure, revenue, and shareholders wealth-a perspective from Singaporean companies. Business Management Dynamics, 1(9), 06–12. https://doi.org/10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20120112A04
Kuasirikun, N., & Sherer, M. (2004). Corporate social accounting disclosure in Thailand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 629–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410554588
Lindblom, C.K. (1993). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. In Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, 16–18 April 1993. Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
Lim, H.J., & Mali, D. (2022). A comparative analysis of human capital information opaqueness in South Korea and the UK. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(6), 1296–1327. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2021-0002
Loliwe, T. (2016). Voluntary employee reporting by the wholesale and retail companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 30(2), 139–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2015.1099216
Long, J.S., & Ervin, L.H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549
Lund Research Ltd. (2018). Independent t-test using SPSS Statistics. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/independent-t-test-using-spss-statistics.php
Lyddon, D. (2007). Strike statistics and the problem of international comparison (pp. 24–40). van der Velden et al.: Strikes.
Mäkelä, H. (2013). On the ideological role of employee reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.11.004
Maltby, J., & Tsamenyi, M. (2010). Narrative accounting disclosure: Its role in the gold mining industry on the Gold Coast 1900–1949. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(5), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.03.001
Marais, L., Ndaguba, E., Mmbadi, E., Cloete, J., & Lenka, M. (2022). Mine closure, social disruption, and crime in South Africa. The Geographical Journal, 188(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12430
Maree, J. (2009). Trends in collective bargaining: Why South Africa differs from global trends. In IIRA World Congress (pp. 1–10).
Markov, M. (2013). Warren Samuels on Economic Analysis, Institutional Theory and Ideology. Economic Alternatives, 4, 5–14.
McCracken, M., McIvor, R., Treacy, R., & Wall, T. (2018). A study of human capital reporting in the United Kingdom. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 130–141.
Merkl-Davies, D.M., & Brennan, N.M. (2017). A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives, traditions, and theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 433–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2039
Monger, J. (2020). International comparisons of labour disputes. International Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice, 1(4), 72–81.
Moolman, S., & Van Der Waldt, G. (2022). The effectiveness of financial governance structures in the South African Public Sector. African Journal of Public Affairs, 13(1), 1–26.
Mullins, R.R., Ahearne, M., Lam, S.K., Hall, Z.R., & Boichuk, J.P. (2014). Know your customer: How salesperson perceptions of customer relationship quality form and influence account profitability. Journal of Marketing, 78(6), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0300
Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N., & Zyglidopoulos, S. (1997). The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: An exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business and Society, 36(3), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600305
Nguyen, V.H., Agbola, F.W., & Choi, B. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce information asymmetry? Empirical evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 44(2), 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896218797163
Omran, M.A., & El-Galfy, A.M. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on corporate disclosure: A critical evaluation and literature survey. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(3), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2014-0013
Pham, N.T., Tučková, Z., & Jabbour, C.J.C. (2019). Greening the hospitality industry: How do green human resource management practices influence organizational citizenship behavior in hotels? A mixed-methods study. Tourism Management, 72, 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.008
Pollach, I. (2014). Corporate environmental reporting and news coverage of environmental issues: An agenda-setting perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(5), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1792
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2011). SA Mine: Review of trends in the South African mining industry. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/sa-mining-2012.pdf
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2019). Purpose and impact in sustainability reporting: A review of leading UK companies. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.co.uk/sustainability-climate-change/assets/pdf/bpta-sustainability-award-report-2019.pdf
Russo, G., Xu, L., McIsaac, M., Matsika-Claquin, M.D., Dhillon, I., McPake, B., & Campbell, J. (2019). Health workers’ strikes in low-income countries: The available evidence. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(7), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.225755
Sgammini, R. (2023). A comparative risk-adjusted performance evaluation of South African SRI Funds and the FTSE/JSE over the Covid-19 Period. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 13(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.13717
Shubham, P.C., & Murty, L.S. (2018). Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: Integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1258373
Sierra, L., Zorio, A., & García-Benau, M.A. (2013), Sustainable development and assurance of corporate social responsibility reports. Ibex-35 Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1303
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the Nature and causes of wealth of nations (p. 2). Book. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.
South African Reserve Bank (SARB). (2020). Quarterly bulletins: Observations on the evolution of corporate listings in South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication-detail-pages/quarterly-bulletins/boxes/2019/9522
Stiglitz, J.E. (2003). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. The American Economist, 20(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943450304700202
Stokke, T.A., & Thornqvist, C. (2001). Strikes and collective bargaining in the Nordic countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 7(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/095968010173002
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
The Labour Relations Act No. 66 of 1995 (LRA). Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/documents/labour-relations-act
The South Africa Legal Information Institute (SAFLII). (2014). National Union of Mineworkers v Lonmin Platinum and Another (J 1118/2013) [2013] ZALCJHB 139; [2013] 10 BLLR 1029 (LC); (2014) 35 ILJ 486 (LC). Retrieved from http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZALCJHB/2013/139.html
The Sustainable Stock Exchanges Initiative (SSE). (n.d.). Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), Retrieved from https://sseinitiative.org/stock-exchange/jse#:~:text=About%20the%20stock%20exchange&text=The%20JSE%20is%20currently%20ranked,first%20South%20African%20gold%20rush
Tripathi, V., & Kaur, A. (2020). Socially responsible investing: Performance evaluation of BRICS nations. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-02-2020-0020
Trotman, K. (1979). Social responsibility disclosures by Australian companies. The Chartered Accountant in Australia, March, 24–28.
Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.009
United Nations’s Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN). (2024). GDP current in USD countries. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20240804131433/https://unstats.un.org/unsd/amaapi/api/file/2
Waithaka, D., Kagwanja, N., Nzinga, J., Tsofa, B., Leli, H., Mataza, C., Nyaguara, A., Bejon, P., Gilson, L., Barasa, E., & Molyneux, S. (2020). Prolonged health worker strikes in Kenya-perspectives and experiences of frontline health managers and local communities in Kilifi County. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1131-y
Webster, E. (2022). The rise of social-movement unionism: The two faces of the black trade union movement in South Africa. In P. Frankel, N. Pines & M. Swilling (Eds.), State, resistance and change in South Africa (pp. 174–196). Routledge.
Williams, M.S. (2017). Examining the economic impact of industrial action activities in South Africa, 2003–2014. Working paper, University of Western Cape.
Williams, S.J., & Adams, C.A. (2013). Moral accounting? Employee disclosures from a stakeholder accountability perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(3), 449–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311311892
Wößmann, L. (2003). Specifying human capital. Journal of economic surveys, 17(3), 239–270.
Zimmerman, D.W. (1987). Comparative power of Student t test and Mann-Whitney U test for unequal sample sizes and variances. The Journal of Experimental Education, 55(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1987.10806451
Appendix 1
TABLE 1-A1: Words that were used for the text searches of employee-related disclosures. |
Appendix 2
Other assumptions tested
TABLE 1-A2: Outliers: The table shows extreme outliers with residuals > 3 standard deviations. |
 |
FIGURE 1-A2: Normality: (a) Histogram Dependent variable: Discl.; (b) Normal P-P plot of regression standardised residual Dependent variable: Discl. |
|
 |
FIGURE 2-A2: Linearity - Scatter plot of: (a) discl. by BEE_score; (b) discl. by revenue; (c) discl. by media; (d) discl. by dir_sh %; (e) discl. by cash to debt; (f) discl. by ROA; (g) discl. by strike; (h) discl. by prolonged; (i) discl. by leverage; (j) discl. by employees; (k) discl. by industry-name. |
|
 |
FIGURE 3-A2: Homoscedasticity: Scatterplot Dependent variable: Discl. |
|
|