Original Research
Entrepreneurial women’s cognitive ambidexterity: Career and cultural influences
Submitted: 15 March 2018 | Published: 31 December 2017
About the author(s)
M. J.de Villiers Scheepers, Stellenbosch University, South Africa and University of the Sunshine Coast, AustraliaC. Boshoff, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
M. Oostenbrink, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (640KB)Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine how women’s career stage and Ubuntu (collectivist) values relate to their cognitive ambidexterity when pursuing entrepreneurial initiatives in multicultural South Africa. In this study individual cognitive ambidexterity was operationalised as using effectual and causal logic. More than three hundred businesswomen from diverse backgrounds were surveyed. The results revealed that career stage, self-efficacy and Ubuntu collectivism are important in women’s ambidexterity. Mature, efficacious women in their late career stage draw on their diverse networks and use effectual affordable loss, flexibility and causation when pursuing entrepreneurial initiatives. In contrast, younger, early-career women are more likely to use pre-commitment to ensure support from stakeholders. Women with Ubuntu values use their relationship skills to draw on resources from their networks and use ambidexterity (effectual and causal logic) in their entrepreneurial endeavours.
The findings suggest that entrepreneurial women who develop their cognitive ambidexterity and draw on both effectual and causal approaches when initiating entrepreneurial initiatives are more likely to experience successful outcomes. These mental approaches can be developed by means of awareness, training and mentoring. This study extends the literature on women’s entrepreneurial decision-making in a culturally diverse society, demonstrating the influence of cultural values and career stage on effectual and causal logic.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4121Total article views: 1559
Crossref Citations
1. Career stages in management studies: a systematic review of scientific production from 2011 to 2020
Nágila Giovanna Silva Vilela, Tania Casado
Revista de Gestão vol: 30 issue: 1 first page: 62 year: 2023
doi: 10.1108/REGE-02-2021-0018
2. The measurement of effectuation: highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future
Alexander McKelvie, Gaylen N. Chandler, Dawn R. DeTienne, Anette Johansson
Small Business Economics vol: 54 issue: 3 first page: 689 year: 2020
doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00149-6
3. Individual ambidexterity in SMEs: Towards a typology aligning the concept, antecedents and outcomes
Ting Mu, Allard van Riel, Roel Schouteten
Journal of Small Business Management vol: 60 issue: 2 first page: 347 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/00472778.2019.1709642
4. Neuroentrepreneurship: an integrative review and research agenda
Gagan Deep Sharma, Justin Paul, Mrinalini Srivastava, Anshita Yadav, John Mendy, Tapan Sarker, Sanchita Bansal
Entrepreneurship & Regional Development vol: 33 issue: 9-10 first page: 863 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/08985626.2021.1966106
5. Women entrepreneurship in marginalized communities: Does culture, Ubuntu, religiosity and ancestral relevance matter?
Divaries Cosmas Jaravaza, Forbes Makudza, Lucia Mandongwe, Simbarashe Muparangi, Tafadzwa Machaka, Benard Chisiri, Paul Mukucha, Nomuhle Jaravaza
Community Development vol: 56 issue: 1 first page: 59 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/15575330.2024.2344206
6. Exploring the affordable loss principle: a systematic literature review
Siliane Ferrari, Sílvio de Vasconcellos
Internext vol: 19 issue: 2 year: 2024
doi: 10.18568/internext.v19i2.800
7. Women in business in Africa: (Re)claiming our agency
Anita Bosch, Lize Booysen
South African Journal of Business Management vol: 52 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2972
8. The relationship between small business owners’ practice of effectuation and business growth in Gauteng townships
Michael Nyoni, Menisha Moos
The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management vol: 14 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.4102/sajesbm.v14i1.453
