Original Research

Students’ entrepreneurial regulation and intention to become an entrepreneur: A comparison between public and private universities

Z. A.L. Pihie, A. Bagheri
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 44, No 4 | a166 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v44i4.166 | © 2018 Z. A.L. Pihie, A. Bagheri | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 April 2018 | Published: 31 December 2013

About the author(s)

Z. A.L. Pihie, Department of Science and Technical Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
A. Bagheri, Department of Entrepreneurship Development, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Tehran University, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Full Text:

PDF (249KB)

Abstract

Motivation and ability to orient ones’ knowledge, thought and behavior to accomplish entrepreneurial goals and tasks has recently termed as entrepreneurial regulation. Entrepreneurial regulation strongly affects the whole process of new venture creation and specifically entrepreneurial opportunity exploration that is the first step in the entrepreneurship process. However, few researchers examined the construct particularly among potential entrepreneurs such as university students. This study aims to measure self-regulation (promotion focus), entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention to become an entrepreneur among university students. 722 students from both public and private universities were randomly selected as the participants based on the assumption that entrepreneurship education and training programs and university environment highly influence the development of entrepreneurial regulation, self-efficacy and intention in students. Analysis of the data revealed a significant relationship between students’ promotion focus, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Furthermore, students from public universities had significantly higher entrepreneurial regulation and intentions than their counterparts from private universities. We discuss the implications of the findings for entrepreneurship research, theory development and education.


Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3841
Total article views: 1349

 

Crossref Citations

1. Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: A bibliometric mapping and visualization
Katharina Fellnhofer
Educational Research Review  vol: 27  first page: 28  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.002

2. Does religiosity affect green entrepreneurial intention? Case study in Indonesia
Martini Dwi Pusparini, Dahlia Bonang, Rheyza Virgiawan, Raditya Sukmana, Setiawan bin Lahuri, Alfarid Fedro
Journal of Islamic Marketing  vol: 16  issue: 2  first page: 548  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1108/JIMA-12-2023-0419

3. Entrepreneurial Intention among Undergraduate Agricultural Students in the Republic of Benin
Rodrigue S. Kaki, Djana B. Mignouna, Augustin K. N. Aoudji, Razack Adéoti
Journal of African Business  vol: 24  issue: 1  first page: 111  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/15228916.2022.2031584

4. Impact of entrepreneurial curriculum on entrepreneurial competencies among students: The mediating role of the campus learning environment in higher education
Javed Iqbal, Muhammad Zaheer Asghar, Ali Asghar, Yasira Waqar
Frontiers in Psychology  vol: 13  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950440

5. The influence of the university entrepreneurial ecosystem on the entrepreneurial intentions of students in Vietnam
Nhung Thuy Tran
Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship  vol: 20  issue: 2  first page: 114  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1108/APJIE-03-2025-0038

6. Emprendimiento social en la formación profesional: el caso del País Vasco
Jorge Antonio Torres Ortega, Jorge Antonio Torres-Ortega
REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos  vol: 137  first page: e73862  year: 2021  
doi: 10.5209/reve.73862

7. Testing Students’ Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as an Early Predictor of Entrepreneurial Activities. Evidence From the SEAS Project
Krzysztof Zięba, Jakub Golik
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation  vol: 14  issue: 1  first page: 91  year: 2018  
doi: 10.7341/20181415