Original Research

The paradox of managing autonomy and control: An exploratory study

G. Gilbert, M. Sutherland
South African Journal of Business Management | Vol 44, No 1 | a144 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v44i1.144 | © 2018 G. Gilbert, M. Sutherland | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 05 April 2018 | Published: 30 March 2013

About the author(s)

G. Gilbert, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa
M. Sutherland, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (399KB)

Abstract

Managers are frequently offered conflicting advice as to how to increase organisational success. One of these complex dilemmas is whether to grant employees autonomy, which may lead to self-management and empowerment or alternatively, exercise control which may enable managers to retain a well-focussed and goal driven workforce. This research focuses on the key factors that influence the various combinations of autonomy and control and their respective outcomes. Qualitative exploratory research was conducted using in-depth interviews with 16 leading South African management and Human Resource experts to uncover their insights regarding this dilemma. The findings suggest that combinations of autonomy and control can co-exist. Management are able to create environments with high levels of autonomy whilst simultaneously retaining high levels of monitoring and oversight when the management control is indirect. It was found that the seemingly contradictory practices of autonomy versus control are a paradox, not a dilemma. Seventeen factors were identified that influence the different levels of autonomy and control in organisations.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2345
Total article views: 1671

 

Crossref Citations

1. Controlling Working Crowds: The Impact of Digitalization on Worker Autonomy and Monitoring Across Hierarchical Levels
Elisa Gerten, Michael Beckmann, Lutz Bellmann
Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik  vol: 239  issue: 3  first page: 441  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1515/jbnst-2017-0154